Verses Claimed to be Constructed and the Ruling about Quoting them

Abstract

This research aims at reviewing and discussing the grammatical and morphological features of poetic quotations that grammarians mentioned but did not accept because they were constructed or not considered to be said by native Arabs whose language can be quoted. To achieve this aim, analogous and similar verses that have been accepted and quoted are used and compared in order to determine the extent to which grammarians are commited to this judgment and the criterion for such a judgement. Moreover, it attempts to find the reason for rejecting and not quoting some of them, which has been transmitted in disputation. Then, it attempts to weight between the opinions of those who accepted and quoted the verse and those who rejected it and considered the verse to be constructed. Finaly, it explains the ruling of quoting these verses that are claimed to be constructed.