The Argument of Invalidating the Opponent's Statement by Demanding a Conceptualization of Their Claim Its Principles and Doctrinal Applications.

Abstract

Abstract:

Praise be to God, prayer and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah and after:

This research aims to define a path of pilgrims among scholars in doctrinal research based on asking the opponent to visualize the saying and opinion that he adopts to show him through his visualization the outrageousness of his saying and criticizing it. And I divided the research into an introduction in which I mentioned the importance of the topic and the questions that it will answer and the previous studies, then I divided it into four sections. The legal evidence from which the legitimacy of invoking the path is derived, and finally I mentioned the fourth topic in which I relied on mentioning some of the dogmatic applications of this path, and I was keen to divide it into two requirements because religion is divided into evidence and issues, so I mentioned in the first requirement some examples in this path that relate to the evidence, which is the book and the Sunnah And other evidence that people relied on in deduction. The second requirement included mentioning some doctrinal issues in which scholars worked this path, then I concluded with a conclusion that contains the most important results, which are:

• The importance of researching the paths of scholars regarding pilgrims, rooting them and explaining their legitimacy.
• The doctrinal library is devoid of talking about this path in a separate subject, and therefore I urge students of knowledge to record this subject, root it and collect its many applications in all aspects of belief.
• The use of scientists for this path in a large way.